Possibilities of Postoperative Rehabilitation After Combination Resection of the Pelvis with Acetabulum and Hip Joint Endoprosthesis
https://doi.org/10.17650/2219-4614-2024-16-2-80-86
Abstract
The article presents a clinical case of successful surgical treatment of primary chondrosarcoma of the right ilium affecting the acetabulum and hip joint with acetabulum endoprosthesis. Rehabilitation measures aimed at restoration of the affected limb function are also described. After these measures, the patient demonstrated excellent functional results (93.3 % per the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score). Recurrence-free period was 49 months. In modern orthopedic oncology, many techniques of organ-preserving surgical treatment in patients with tumors of the periacetabular area with subsequent reconstruction are used but they are technically complex and carry high risks of postoperative complications. In our opinion, only combination of surgical techniques with interdisciplinary approach during perioperative rehabilitation allows to achieve good and even excellent functional results which is confirmed by the presented clinical case.
About the Authors
D. A. Erin
P.A. Herzen Moscow Scientific Research Oncological Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
3 2nd Botkinskij Proezd, Moscow 125284
V. A. Derzhavin
P.A. Herzen Moscow Scientific Research Oncological Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
3 2nd Botkinskij Proezd, Moscow 125284
A. V. Bukharov
P.A. Herzen Moscow Scientific Research Oncological Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
3 2nd Botkinskij Proezd, Moscow 125284
A. V. Yadrina
P.A. Herzen Moscow Scientific Research Oncological Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
3 2nd Botkinskij Proezd, Moscow 125284
D. O. Elkhov
P.A. Herzen Moscow Scientific Research Oncological Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
3 2nd Botkinskij Proezd, Moscow 125284
M. D. Aliyev
National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
3 2nd Botkinskij Proezd, Moscow 125284
References
1. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2020 (morbidity and mortality). Edited by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii 2021. 252 p. (In Russ.).
2. Grimer R.J., Chandrasekar C.R., Carter S.R. et al. Hindquarter amputation. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B(1):127–31. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B1.29131
3. Higinbotham N.L., Marcove R.C., Casson P. Hemipelvectomy: a clinical study of 100 cases with five-year-follow-up on 60 patients. Surgery 1966;59(5):706–8.
4. Karakousis C.P., Vezeridis M.P. Variants of hemipelvectomy. Am J Surg 1983;145(2):273–7. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90079-x
5. Iluridze G.D., Bucharov A.V., Karpenko V.Yu., Derzhavin V.A. Results of modular endoprosthetic reconstruction of periacetabular bone defects in patients with tumors of the acetabulum and hip joint. Sibirskij onkologicheskij zhurnal = Siberian Journal of Oncology 2020;19(2):90–9. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21294/1814-4861-2020-19-2-90-99
6. Guo W., Li D., Tang X. et al. T. Reconstruction with modular hemipelvic prostheses for periacetabular tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;461:180–8. DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31806165d5
7. Barrientos-Ruiz I., Ortiz-Cruz E., Peleteiro-Pensado M. Reconstruction after hemipelvectomy with the ice-cream cone prosthesis: what are the short-term clinical results? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475(3):735–41. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4747-x
8. Witte D., Bernd L., Bruns J. et al. Limb-salvage reconstruction with MUTARS® hemipelvic endoprosthesis: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009;35(12):1318–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.04.011
9. De Paolis M., Biazzo A., Romagnoli С. et al. The use of iliac stem prosthesis for acetabular defects following resections for periacetabular tumors. Scientific World Journal 2013;2013:717031. DOI: 10.1155/2013/717031
10. Bus M., Szafranski A., Sellevold S. et al. LUMiC endoprosthetic reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection: short-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475(3):686–95. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4805-4
11. Wirtz D.C., Heller K.D., Niethard F.U. Biomechanische Aspekte der Belastungsfähigkeit nach totalendoprothetischem Ersatz des Hüftgelenkes. Eine Auswertung des derzeitigen Kenntnisstandes im Literaturüberblick Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1998;136(4):310–6. (In German). DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1053743
12. Paramanandam V., Daptardar A., Gulia A. Rehabilitation following limb-salvage surgery in sarcoma. Journal of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors 2016;2(2):19–21. DOI: 10.13107/jbst.2454–5473.147
13. Skvortsov D.V. Stabilometric research (short guide). Moscow: Mera-TSP, 2010. 171 p. (In Russ.).
14. Bogolyubov V.M. Medical rehabilitation: a guide. In 3 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow, 1885. (In Russ.).
15. Jansen J.A., van de Sande M.A.J., Dijkstra P.D.S. Poor long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after resection of periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471(1):324–31. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2631-x
16. Derzhavin V.A., Karpenko V.Yu., Bukharov A.V. et al. Modular endoprosthetic replacement of the periacetabular region in the tumor involvement of the acetabulum and hip joint. Preliminary results. Onkologiya. Zhurnal im. P.A. Gercena = P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology 2018;7(2):26–32. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/onkolog20187226-32
Review
For citations:
Erin D.A., Derzhavin V.A., Bukharov A.V., Yadrina A.V., Elkhov D.O., Aliyev M.D. Possibilities of Postoperative Rehabilitation After Combination Resection of the Pelvis with Acetabulum and Hip Joint Endoprosthesis. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin. 2024;16(2):80-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2219-4614-2024-16-2-80-86
Views:
505
Email this article 
