Cervical spine surgery under the navigation system control
Abstract
Surgical procedures of cervical spine tumors includes two steps – removing of the tumor and stabilization. Making of the fixation on the cervical spine requires carefull examination of the patient before the surgical treatment and high accuracy intraoperation control, due to the potential risk of iatrogenic damage of the spinal cord, nerve roots or vertebral artery is the most often on cervical spine. Decreasing intraoperation radiation level on patient and surgical crew is as important problem. The decision of all questions is the use of the computer assisted navigation system. This method allows to make fixation with various type of screws or making intraoperation control of the bone needle biopsy, vertebra- or kyfoplasty with high accuracy, minimal risk of iatrogenic damaging and decreasing radiation level (because of the shortening work time or stop using standard methods of placement control – computer tomography or X-ray).
About the Authors
A. K. Valiev
N.N Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
K. A. Borzov
N.N Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
S. A. Schipakhin
N.N Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
D. I. Safronov
N.N Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. S. Nered
N.N Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
E. R. Musaev
N.N Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Берснев В.П., Давыдов Е.А., Кондаков Е.Н. Хирургия позвоночника, спинного мозга и периферических нервов. СПб., «Специальная Литература». 1998, с. 368.
2. Валиев А.К. Онкологические аспекты лечения опухолей позвоночника. Диссертация канд. мед. наук. 2005.
3. Воронович И.Р., ПашкевичЛ.А. Опухоли позвоночника. БелЦНМИ. 2000.
4. Повреждения позвоночника и спинного мозга. Под ред. Н.Е. Полищука, Н.А. Коржа, В.Я. Фищенко. Киев: «КНИГА плюс», 2001.
5. Boriani S., Weinstein J.N. Differential diagnosis and surgical treatment of primary benign and malignant neoplasms. The adult spine. Philadephia, PA. Lippincott-Raven. 1997, p. 951-987.
6. Brihaye J., Ectors P., Lemort M. The management of spinal epidural metastases. Adv. Tech. Stand. Neurosurgery. 1988.
7. Ludwig S.C., Kramer D.L., Balderston R.A. Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine. Spine. 2000, v. 25, p. 1655-1667.
8. Ludwig S.C., Kowalski J.M., Edwards C.C. et al. Cervical pedicle screws: Comparative accuracy of two insertion techniques. Spine. 2000, v. 25, p. 2675-2681.
9. McLain R.F., Bell G.R. Newer management options in patients with spinal metastasis. Cleve Clin. J. Med. 1998, v. 65, p. 359-367.
10. Rampersaud Y.R., Pick J.H.T., Salonel D. et al. Clinical accuracy of fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screws fixation: a CT analysis. Spine. 2005, v. 30, p. E183-190.
11. Regis W. Haid, Brian R. Subach, Gerald E. Rodts, Karger A.G. Advances in spinal stabilization. 2003.
12. Richter M., Amiot L. Computer assisted surgery in posterior instrumentation. Eur. Spine J. 2000.
13. Richter M., Balkan C., Schmidt R. Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer assisted placement of cannulated screws. Spine. 2005, v. 30, p. 2280-2287.
14. Roodman G.D. Mechanisms of bone resorption in myeloma, J. Musculoskel Neuron Interact. 2003, v. 3 (4), p. 271-272.
15. Sundaresan N., Rosen G., Boriani S. Primary malignant tumors of the spine. Orthopedic clinics of North America. 2009, v. 40 (1), p. 21-36.
Review
For citations:
Valiev A.K., Borzov K.A., Schipakhin S.A., Safronov D.I., Nered A.S., Musaev E.R. Cervical spine surgery under the navigation system control. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin. 2014;(2):3-8. (In Russ.)
Views:
89
Email this article 
