Application of 3D modeling and additive technologies in personalized medicine
Abstract
Additive production is perceived as a revolutionary technology. Without this technology, individual adaptation of many medical products and services would not be possible: personalized implants, including exo- and endoprostheses; orthopedic devices, development of bio-production, devices for the introduction and delivery of medicines, precision instruments, anatomical models in vitro. Thus, additive production is already widely used in many areas of medical research and clinical practice, but there remains a huge potential for implementing a variety of technological tasks. The introduction of additive production takes place at a high speed, which makes it necessary to study all the capabilities.
About the Authors
G. P. Kotelnikov
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Samara
A. V. Kolsanov
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Samara
A. N. Nikolaenko
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Samara
N. V. Popov
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Samara
V. V. Ivanov
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Samara
A. E. Scherbovskih
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Samara
S. A. Prichodko
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Samara
P. V. Platonov
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Samara
References
1. Carter S., Costa P., Vaquette C. et al. Additive biomanufacturing: an advanced approach for periodontal tissue regeneration. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016, No. 45 (1), p. 12-22.
2. Spottiswoode B., van den Heever D., Chang Y. et al. Preoperative three-dimensional model creation of magnetic resonance brain images as a tool to assist neurosurgical planning. Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. 2013, v. 91 (3), p. 162-169.
3. Groll J., Boland T., Blunk T. et al. Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication. 2016, v. 8 (1), p. 013001.
4. Zhang Y., Yue K., Aleman J. et al. 3D bioprinting for tissue and organ fabrication. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016, v. 45 (1), p. 148-163.
5. Kang H., Lee S., Ko I. et al. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nature biotechnology. 2016, v. 34 (3), p. 312-319.
6. Lee V., Dai G. Printing of three-dimensional tissue analogs for regenerative medicine. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016, v. 45(1), p. 115-131.
7. MorrisV., Nimbalkar S.,YounesiM. et al.Mechanical properties, cytocompatibility and manufacturability of chitosan: pegda hybrid-gel scaffolds by stereolithography. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016, v. 45 (1), p. 286-296.
8. Bose S., Tarafder S., Bandyopadhyay A. Effect of chemistry on osteogenesis and angiogenesis towards bone tissue engineering using 3d printed scaffolds. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016, v. 45 (1), p. 261-272.
9. s9.Stichler S., Jungst T., Schamel M. et al. Thiol-ene clickable poly(glycidol) hydrogels for biofabrication. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016, v. 45 (1), p. 273-285.
10. Vaezi M., Seitz H., Yang S. Erratum to: A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology. 2013, v. 67 (5-8), p. 1957-1957.
11. Zadpoor A. Mechanical meta-materials. Mater. Horiz. 2016, v. 3 (5), p. 371-381.
12. Chen Y., Zhou S., Li Q. Microstructure design of biodegradable scaffold and its effect on tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2011, v. 32 (22), p. 5003-5014.
13. Amin Yavari S., Ahmadi S., van der Stok J. et al. Effects of bio-functionalizing surface treatments on the mechanical behavior of open porous titanium biomaterials. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 2014, v. 36, p. 109-119.
14. Skardal A., Atala A. Biomaterials for integration with 3-D bioprinting. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2014, v. 43 (3), p. 730-746.
15. Connell J., Ritschdorff E., Whiteley M., Shear J. 3D printing of microscopic bacterial communities. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 2013, v. 110 (46), p. 18380-18385.
16. MüllerM., ÖztürkE.,Arlov Ø. et al.Alginate sulfate – nanocellulosebioinks for cartilage bioprinting applications. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016, v. 45 (1), p. 210-223.
17. Nguyen A., Narayan R. Liquid-phase laserinduced forward transfer for complex organic inks and tissue engineering. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016, v. 45 (1), p. 84-99.
18. Ahlfeld T., Akkineni A., Förster Y. et al. Design and fabrication of complex scaffolds for bone defect healing: combined 3D plotting of a calcium phosphate cement and a growth factor-loaded hydrogel. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016, v. 45 (1), p. 224-236.
19. Schon B., Hooper G., Woodfield T. Modular tissue assembly strategiesfor biofabrication of engineered cartilage. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016, v. 45 (1), p. 100-114.
20. Zadpoor A. Bone tissue regeneration: the role of scaffold geometry. Biomater. Sci. 2015, v. 3 (2), p. 231-245.
21. Vanderburgh J., Sterling J., Guelcher S. 3D printing of tissue engineered constructs for in vitro modeling of disease progression and drug screening. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016, v. 45 (1), p. 164-179.
22. Wang C., Tang Z., Zhao Y. et al. Three-dimensional in vitro cancer models: a short review. Biofabrication. 2014, v. 6 (2), p. 022001.
23. Malda J., Visser J., Melchels F. et al. 25th Anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Advanced materials. 2013, v. 25 (36), p. 5011-5028.
24. Park J., Jang J., Lee J., Cho D. Three-dimensional printing of tissue/organ analogues containing living cells. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016, v. 45 (1), p. 180-194.
25. Goyanes A., Robles Martinez P., Buanz A. et al. Effect of geometry on drug release from 3D printed tablets. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2015, v. 494 (2), p. 657-663.
26. Norman J., Madurawe R., Moore C. et al. A new chapter in pharmaceutical manufacturing: 3D-printed drug products. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2017, v. 108, p. 39-50.
27. Trombetta R., Inzana J., Schwarz E. et al. 3D printing of calcium phosphate ceramics for bone tissue engineering and drug delivery. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016, v. 45 (1), p. 23-44.
28. Urrios A., Parra-Cabrera C., Bhattacharjee N. et al. 3D-printing of transparent bio-microfluidic devices in PEG-DA. Lab. chip. 2016, v. 16 (12), p. 2287-2294.
29. Zhang Q., Jiang Y., Zhang Y. et al. Effect of porosity on long-term degradation of poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffolds and their cellular response. Polymer degradation and stability. 2013, v. 98 (1), p. 209-218.
30. Burn M., Ta A., Gogola G. Three-dimensional printing of prosthetic handsforchildren.Thejournalofhandsurgery.2016,v.41(5),p.103-109.
31. Jelínek F., Pessers R., Breedveld P. Dragonflex smart steerable laparoscopic instrument. Journal of medical devices. 2014, v. 8 (1), p. 015001.
32. Emons M., Obata K., Binhammer T. et al. Two-photon polymerization technique with sub-50 nm resolution by sub-10 fs laser pulses. Optical materials express. 2012, v. 2 (7), p. 942.
33. Kondor S., Grant C., Liacouras P. et al. On demand additive manufacturing of a basic surgical kit. Journal of medical devices. 2013, v. 7 (3), p. 030916.
34. Zein N., Hanouneh I., Bishop P. et al. Three-dimensional print of a liver for preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation. Liver transplantation. 2013, v. 19 (12), p. 1304-1310.
Review
For citations:
Kotelnikov G.P., Kolsanov A.V., Nikolaenko A.N., Popov N.V., Ivanov V.V., Scherbovskih A.E., Prichodko S.A., Platonov P.V. Application of 3D modeling and additive technologies in personalized medicine. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin. 2017;(1):20-26. (In Russ.)
Views:
272
Email this article 
