The first experience of diaphysis-preserving total hip arthroplasty. Case report
Abstract
In modern oncological orthopedics, an active search for the most optimal concept for the design of the manufacture of artificial joints and fixation parts of endoprostheses of rare anatomical areas continues, and the development of techniques for performing operations. The functional capabilities of patients after segmental resection of the proximal and distal femur significantly outweigh the patients after total femoral bone replacement, even with extensive resection. The preservation of the muscular apparatus of the upper and middle part of the femur with diaphysis-preserving total endoprosthetics, minimizes the risks of hip joint luxation, it is important to achieve similar functional results with segmental resection of the femur.
About the Authors
A. V. Sokolovskii
Federal State Budgetary Institution «N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
V. A. Sokolovskii
Federal State Budgetary Institution «N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
R. N. Badyrov
Federal State Budgetary Institution «N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. D. Aliev
Federal State Budgetary Institution «N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Ahmed AR (2010) Total femur replacement. Arch Orthop TraumaSurg 130:171–176.DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0945-2.
2. PalaE,Trovarelli G, CalabroT,AngeliniA,Abati NC, Ruggieri P. (2014). Survival of Modern Knee Tumor Megaprostheses: Failures, Functional Results and a Comparative Statistical Analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3699-2.
3. Schwartz AJ, Kabo JM, Eilber FC, Eilber FR, Eckardt JJ. Cemented distal femoral endoprostheses for musculoskeletal tumor: improved survival of modular versus custom implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(8):2198-210.
4. Schwartz AJ, Kabo JM, Eilber FC, Eilber FR, Eckardt JJ. Cemented endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal tibia: how long do they last? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(11):2875-2884.
5. PalaE, HendersonER, CalabroT,AngeliniA,Abati CN, Trovarelli G et al. Survival of current production tumor endoprostheses: Complications, functional results, and a comparative statistical analysis. J Surg Oncol 2013;108(6):403-408.
6. Krista A. Goulding Czar Louie Gaston Robert J. Grimer. Outcomes and Options for Prosthetic Reconstruction After Tumour Resection About the Knee. Curr Surg Rep (2014) 2:42. DOI: 10.1007/s40137-013-0042-x.
7. Алиев М.Д., Соколовский А.В., Соколовский В.А., Сергеев П.С. Результаты реконструкции голеностопного суставамегапротезомпри поражении опухолью дистального отдела большеберцовой кости. Cаркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2010, № 4, с. 13-18.
8. Соколовский А.В. Эндопротезирование лопатки в сравнении с другими видами реконструктивных операций этой области. Cаркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи 2013, № 3, с. 26-30.
9. Jones KB, Griffin AM, Chandrasekar CR, Biau D, Babinet A, Deheshi B, Bell RS, Grimer RJ, Wunder JS, Ferguson PC Patient-oriented functional results of total femoral endoprosthetic reconstruction following oncologic resection. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:561-565. DOI: 10.1002/jso.22003.
10. Gosheger G, Hillmann A, Lindner N, Rodl R, Hoffmann C, Burger H, Winkelmann W. Soft tissue reconstruction of megaprostheses using a trevira tube. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:264-271.
11. Jelle Gorter, Joris J.W. Ploegmakers, Bas L.E.F. ten Have, Hendrik W.B. Schreuder, Paul C. Jutte. The push-through total femoral prosthesis offers a functionalalternative to total femoralreplacement: a case series.International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3467-5.
12. Natarajan MV, Balasubramanian N, Jayasankar V, Sameer M. Endoprosthetic reconstruction using total femoral custom megaprosthesis in malignant bone tumors. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1359-1363. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0737-x.
13. Ruggieri P, Bosco G, Pala E, Errani C, Mercuri M. Local recurrence,survival and function aftertotal femurresection and megaprosthetic reconstruction for bone sarcomas. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2860-2866. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1476-4.
14. SewellMD, SpiegelbergBG, Hanna SA,Aston WJ,Bartlett W, Blunn GW, David LA, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. Total femoral endoprosthetic replacementfollowing excision of bone tumors. J Bone Joint Surg (Br.). 2009;91:1513-1520.
15. Clement ND, MacDonald D, Ahmed I, Patton JT, Howie CR. Total femoral replacement for salvage of periprosthetic fractures. Orthopedics. 2014;37:e789-e795. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20140825-55.
16. Sewell MD, Spiegelberg BG, Hanna SA, Aston WJ, Bartlett W, Blunn GW, David LA, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. Total femoral endoprosthetic replacement following excision of bone tumors. J Bone Joint Surg (Br.). 2009;91:1513-1520. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.91b11.21996.
Review
For citations:
Sokolovskii A.V., Sokolovskii V.A., Badyrov R.N., Aliev M.D. The first experience of diaphysis-preserving total hip arthroplasty. Case report. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin. 2017;(3):43-49. (In Russ.)
Views:
108
Email this article 
