Reconstructive surgery in treatment of patients with malignant tumors of the pelvic ring
Abstract
The objective. To evaluate oncological and functional results of reconstructive surgery in patients with malignant tumors of the pelvic ring. Materials and methods. 18 patients with malignant tumors of the pelvic ring were observed. 8 (44%) patients underwent reconstructive surgery with endoprosthesis replacement, 4 (22%) - with iliosacral or ischiosacral fixation, 3 (17%) - with combination of steel nails and PMMK, and 3 (17%) - with PMMK only. Results. Wide resection was achieved in 15 (84%) cases. 14 patients were without signs of disease with the mean follow up of 23 (5-46) months. In all patients functional results after surgery were perfect or good. Complications were observed in 7 (39%) cases.
About the Authors
V. V. Tepliakov
P.A. Gertzen Moscow Cancer Research Center, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. U. Karpenko
P.A. Gertzen Moscow Cancer Research Center, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Derzhavin
P.A. Gertzen Moscow Cancer Research Center, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. A. Frank
P.A. Gertzen Moscow Cancer Research Center, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Bulanov
N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Bukharov
P.A. Gertzen Moscow Cancer Research Center, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. V. Myslevtsev
P.A. Gertzen Moscow Cancer Research Center, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. A. Anurova
P.A. Gertzen Moscow Cancer Research Center, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. A. Rubtsova
P.A. Gertzen Moscow Cancer Research Center, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. V. Epifanova
P.A. Gertzen Moscow Cancer Research Center, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. V. Vorobiov
P.A. Gertzen Moscow Cancer Research Center, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
U. U. Sundui
P.A. Gertzen Moscow Cancer Research Center, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. V. Sekhina
N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Гафтон Г.И., Гудзь Ю.В. Хирургическое лечение сарком костей таза. Практическая онкология. 2010, т. 11, № 1, с. 25-30.
2. Мусаев Э.Р. Современные подходы к хирургическому лечению больных опухолями костей таза. Автореферат диссертации д-ра мед. наук. РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина. М., 2008, с. 1-42.
3. Тепляков В.В., Карпенко В.Ю., Франк Г.А., Державин В.А., Буланов А.А., Бухаров А.В. Хирургические аспекты лечения новообразований костей таза. VII съезд онкологов России. Сб. материалов, т. II. М., 2009, с. 140.
4. Тепляков В.В., Чиссов В.И., Франк ГА. и соавт. Хирургическое лечение пациентов с опухолями тазового кольца. Российский онкологический журнал. 2011, № 3, с. 15-21.
5. Abudu A., Grimer R.J., Cannon S.R., Carter S.R., Sneath R.S. Reconstruction of thehemipelvis after the excision of malignant tumours. Complications and functionaloutcome of prostheses. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1997, v. 79, p. 773-779.
6. Akiyama T., Clark J.C.M., Miki Y., Choong P.F.M. The nonvascularised fibular graft. A simple and successful method of reconstruction of the pelvic ring after internal hemipelvectomy. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2010, v. 92-B, No. 7, p. 999-1005.
7. Aljassir F., Beadel G.P., Turcotte R.E. et al. Outcome after pelvic sarcoma resection reconstructed with saddle prosthesis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005, v. 438, p. 36-41.
8. Bruns J., Luessenhop S.L., Dahmen G. Internal hemipelvectomy and endoprosthetic pelvic replacement: long-term follow-up results. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.1997, v. 116, p. 27-31.
9. Cooperative Osteosarkomstudie COSS-96. Therapieprotokoll der Gesellschaft fur padiatrische Onkologie und Hamatologie, 1996, p 44-50.
10. Cottias P., Jeanrot C., Vinh T.S., Tomeno B., Anract P. Complications and functionalevaluation of 17 saddle prostheses for resection of periacetabular tumors. J. Surg. Oncol. 2001, v. 78, p. 90-100.
11. Delloye C., Banse X., Brichard B., Docquier P.L., Cornu O. Pelvic reconstruction with a structural pelvic allograft after resection of a malignant bone tumor. J. Bone Joint. Surg. Am. 2007, v. 89, p. 579-587.
12. Enneking W.E., Dunham W.K. Resection and reconstruction for primary neo-plasms involving the innominate bone. J. Bone Joint. Surg. [Am.] 1978, v. 60-A, p. 731-746.
13. Enneking W.F., Dunham W., Gebhart M.C., Malawar M., Pritchard D.J. A system of the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1993, v. 286, p. 241-246.
14. Fisher N.E., Patton J.T., Grimer R.J. et al. Ice-cream cone reconstruction of the pelvis: a new type of pelvic replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2011, v. 93-B, No. 5, p. 684-688.
15. Fornasier V.L. Classification of Bone Tumors. In: Current Concepts of Diagnosis and Treatment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. Berlin: Springer. 1984, p. 23-27.
16. Ginsberg J.P., Woo S.Y., Johnson M.E. et al. Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors: Ewing’s sarcoma of bone and soft tissue and the peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors, in Pizzo P.A., Poplack D.G. (eds.): Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology (ed. 4). Philidelphia, PA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2002, p. 973-1016
17. Gradinger R., Rechl H., Scheyerer M., Hipp E. Nicht-radikale Operationen von malignen Beckentumoren. Z. Orthop. 1989, p. 420-423.
18. Guo W., Li D., Tang X., Ji T. Reconstruction with modular hemipelvic prostheses for periacetabular tumor. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007, v. 461, p. 180-188.
19. Guo W., Li D., Tang X., Ji T. Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Chondrosarcoma Involving Periacetabulum. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2010, v. 101, p. 160-165.
20. Han I., Lee Y., M.D., et al. Outcome after Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Sarcomas. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery. 2010, v. 2, No. 3, p. 160-166.
21. Jaiswal P.K., Aston W.J.S., Grimer R.J., Abudu A. et al. Periacetabular resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction for tumours ofthe acetabulum. J. Bone Joint. Surg. 2008, v. 90-B, p. 1222-1227.
22. Kitagawa Y., Ek E.T., Choong P.F. Pelvic reconstruction using saddle prosthesis following limb salvage operation for periacetabular tumour. J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong) 2006, v. 14, p. 155-162.
23. Menendez L.R., Ahlmann E.R., Falkinstein Y., Allison D.C. Periacetabular Reconstruction with a New Endoprosthesis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009, v. 467, No. 11, p. 2831-2837.
24. Price C.H., Jeffree G.M. Incidence of bone sarcoma in SW England, 1946-74, in relation to age, sex, tumour site and histology. Br. J. Cancer. 1977, v. 36, p. 511-522.
25. Satcher Jr. R.L., O’Donnell R.J., Johnston J.O. Reconstruction of the pelvis after resection of tumors about the acetabulum. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003, v. 409, p. 209-217.
26. Senchenkov A., Moran S.L., Petty M. et al. Predictors of complications and outcomes of external hemipelvectomy wounds: account of 160 conservative cases. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008, v. 15, p. 355-363.
27. Timothy A. Damron et al. Orthopaedic surgery essentials. Oncology and Basic Science. Lippincot Williams & Wilkins. 2008, p. 3, 63.
28. Weber U. Knochentumoren. In: Zilal, Weber (Hrsg.), de Gruyter. Lehrbuch fur Orthopadie. 1988.
29. Wirbel R.J., Schulte M., Mutschler W.E. Surgical treatment of pelvicsarcomas: oncologic and functional outcome. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2001, p. 190-205.
Review
For citations:
Tepliakov V.V., Karpenko V.U., Derzhavin V.A., Frank G.A., Bulanov A.A., Bukharov A.V., Myslevtsev I.V., Anurova O.A., Rubtsova N.A., Epifanova S.V., Vorobiov N.V., Sundui U.U., Sekhina O.V. Reconstructive surgery in treatment of patients with malignant tumors of the pelvic ring. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin. 2012;(3):16-29. (In Russ.)
Views:
118
Email this article 
