Preview

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin

Advanced search

BONE CHONDROSARCOMA DIAGNOSTIC DIFFICULTIES OF VARYING MALIGNANCY GRADES

Abstract

Biopsy and operating material was analyzed in patients who were diagnosed with bone chondrosarcoma and underwent surgery in the departments of CITO clinic named by N. Priorov since 1987 to 2009 years. Clinical and morphological features of chondrosarcoma were assessed by three grade of malignancy which based on the histologic features such as the size of the nucleus, mitotic activity, the presence of binuclear and polynuclear cells, cell density, the nature of the extracellular matrix, as well as clinical and radiological data. Among 458 cases which were diagnosed during this period as a conventional chondrosarcoma, 228 cases (49,78%) were classified as a low, 152 (33,18%) as a middle and 78 (17,03%) as a high degree of malignancy. Regardless of grade chondrosarcoma most commonly affects the femur, pelvis, humerus. Histological differences of chondroproducing benign and lowgrade malignant tumors are minimal and greatly subjective, that dictates the necessity of more objective estimation methods to grade cartilage forming tumors. In the some cases, the histological criteria for malignancy of chondrosarcoma are depending on anatomical localization of the pathological process. Cytological and histological diagnosis of chondrosarcoma should be based on the data from the mandatory clinics and methods of radiation diagnosis in specialized centers, dealing with bone cancer.

About the Authors

Г. Берченко
ЦИТО им. Н.Н. Приорова
Russian Federation


О. Шугаева
ЦИТО им. Н.Н. Приорова
Russian Federation


G. N. Berchenko
Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics CITO
Russian Federation


O. B. Shugayeva
Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics CITO
Russian Federation


References

1. Соловьёв Ю.Н. Хрящеобразующие опухоли. Патолого-анатомичекая диагностика опухолей человека. Руководство для врачей (ред. Н.А. Краевский, А.В. Смольянников, Д.С. Саркисов). М., «Медицина». 1993, с. 498-513.

2. Schajowicz F. Tumors and tumorlike lesions of bone. Pathology, radiology and treatment. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin etc. 1994, p. 201-229.

3. Unni K.K. Dahlin's bone tumors. General aspects and data on 11087. cases. 5th ed., Springfield. Philadelphia. 1996, p. 227-245.

4. Dorfman H.D., Czerniak B. Bone tumors. Mosby, Inc. 1998, p. 353-395.

5. Bertoni F., Bacchini P., Hogendoorn P.C.W. Chondrosarcoma. In «Tumours of soft tissue andbone». World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Ed. Fletcher C.D.M, Unni K.K., Mertens F. IARCPress, Lyon. 2002, p. 227-244.

6. Horvai A. Cartilage-Forming Tumors. In: Bone and Soft Tissue Pathology (Foundations in diagnostic pathology). Edit. Folpe A.L., Inwards C.I. Sauners. 2010, p. 330-354.

7. Виноградова Т.П. Опухоли костей. М., 1973, с. 135-150.

8. Берченко Г.Н. «Заболевание костно-суставной системы» В кн.: «Патология (руководство)». Под редакцией Пальцева М.А., Паукова B.C., Улумбекова Э.Г. Издательский дом «Гэотар-Мед». М., 2002, с. 565-597.

9. Evans H.L., Ayala A.C., Romsdahl M.M. Prognostic factors in chondrosarcoma of bone. A clinicopathological analysis with emphasis on histologic grading. Cancer. 1977, v. 40. p. 818-831.

10. Bjornsson J., McLeod R.A., Unni K.K., Ilstrup D.M., Pritchard D.J. Primary chondrosarcoma of long bones and limb girdles. Cancer. 1998, v. 83, p. 2105-2119.

11. Zenmyo M., Tanimoto A., Sakakima H. et al. Gadd45β expression in chondrosarcoma: A pilot study gor diagnostic and biological implications in histological grading. Diagnostic Pathology. 2010, v. 5, p. 69-73.

12. Nikoghosyan A.V., Rauch G., Munter M.W et al. Randomized trial of proton vs. carbon ion radiation therapy in patients with low and intermediate grade chondrosarcoma of the skull base, clinical phase III study. BMC Cancer. 2010, v. 10, p. 606-611.

13. Кузьмина Л.П., Липкин С.И. Клинико-морфологические сопоставления при хондросаркоме костей. Вопросы онкологии. 1971, том 17, № 9, с. 47-53.

14. McCarthy E.F., Frassica F.G. Pathology of bone and joint disorders with clinical and radiographic correlation. W.B. Saunders company. Philadelphia etc. 1998, p. 235-240.

15. Sanerkin N.G. The diagnosis and grading of chondrosarcoma of bone: a combined cytologic and histologic approach. Cancer. v. 45, p. 582-594.

16. Skeletal lesions interobserver correlation among expert diagnosticians study group: Reliability of histopathological and radiologic grading of cartilaginous neoplasms in long bones. J. Bone joint Surg. Am. 2007, v. 89, p. 2113-2123.

17. Aarons C., Potter B.R., Adams S.C. et al. Extended intral-esional treatment versus resection of low-grade chondrosarcomas. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009, v. 467, p. 2105-2111.


Review

For citations:


 ,  , Berchenko G.N., Shugayeva O.B. BONE CHONDROSARCOMA DIAGNOSTIC DIFFICULTIES OF VARYING MALIGNANCY GRADES. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin. 2011;(4):21-28. (In Russ.)

Views: 110


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2219-4614 (Print)
ISSN 2782-3687 (Online)