Role of radical surgical treatment in patients with soft tissue sarcomas invading bone
https://doi.org/10.17650/2219-4614-2024-16-4-80-88
Abstract
To analyze the overall survival, mid-term, and long-term outcomes, as well as the complication structure in a group of patients after endoprosthetic replacement for soft tissue sarcomas infiltrating bone, the treatment results of 19 patients who underwent 24 primary and repeated surgeries from May 2004 to November 2021 were analyzed. The average follow-up period was 132.5 months. The average age at the time of endoprosthetic replacement was 47.7 ± 15.3 years. It was shown that the event-free survival of the operated patients after 3 years was 61.5 ± 11.5 %, after 5 years – 54.7 % ± 12.1 %, and remained at the same level after 10 years. The average time to tumor recurrence was 11 months, lung metastasis occurred at 96 months, and both recurrence and metastases were detected on average within 2 months. The overall survival of patients with soft tissue sarcomas through 3 years was 93.3 ± 6.4 %, through 5 years – 80.0 ± 10.3 %, and through 10 years – 65.5 ± 12.6 %. Across the entire group of respondents, disease progression was observed in 42.1 % of cases, tumor recurrence in 31.6 %; metastases (to the lungs) in 5.3 %; recurrence of the disease and metastases in 5.3 %. These data indicate that endoprosthetic replacement as a component of combined organ-preserving treatment for patients with soft tissue sarcomas infiltrating bone is an effective treatment method for improving the quality of life of patients, despite certain risks of disease recurrence, metastasis, and complications.
About the Authors
N. S. PetrochenkoRussian Federation
Nikolay Sergeevich Petrochenko
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
A. V. Sokolovsky
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
V. A. Sokolovsky
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
E. I. Gribkova
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
O. G. Spirina
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
A. V. Fedorova
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
A. K. Valiev
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
References
1. Benites B.M., Miranda-Silva W., Fonseca F.P. et al. Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the mandible. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;46(4):282–7. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.4.282
2. Ferguson P.C., Griffin A.M., O’Sullivan B. et al. Bone invasion in extremity soft-tissue sarcoma: impact on disease outcomes. Cancer 2006;106(12):2692–700. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21949
3. Sarria G.R., Petrova V., Wenz F. et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy with low energy X-rays for primary and recurrent soft-tissue sarcomas. Radiat Oncol 2020;15:110.
4. Ebert M.A., Fedosova E.A., Novikov S.N. et al. Results of combined radiation treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. Voprosy onkologii = Problems in Oncology 2023;69(3S):391–2.
5. Han G., Bi W.Z., Xu M. et al. Amputation versus limb-salvage surgery in patients with osteosarcoma: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 2016;40(8):2016–27. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3500-7
6. He X., Gao Z., Xu H. et al. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials of surgical methods with osteosarcoma outcomes. Orthop Surg Res 2017;12(1):5. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-016-0500-0
7. Wafa H., Reddy K., Grimer R. et al. Does total humeral endoprosthetic replacement provide reliable reconstruction with preservation of a useful extremity? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473(3):917–25. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3635-5
8. Jiang F., Shi Y., Li G.J., Zhou F. A meta-analysis of limb-salvage versus amputation in the treatment of patients with Enneking II pathologic fracture osteosarcoma. Indian J Cancer 2015;51 (Suppl 2):e21–4. DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.151997
9. Hanasilo C.E., Casadei M.S., Auletta L. et al. Comparative study of planned and unplanned excisions for the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2014;9:579–84. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2014(09)01
10. Nandra R., Hwang N., Matharu G. et al. One-year mortality in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas as an indicator of delay in presentation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2015;97(6):425–33.
11. Rowell P.D., Ferguson P.C., Tsoi K.M. et al. Endoprosthetic reconstruction for lower extremity soft tissue sarcomas with bone involvement. J Surg Oncol 2023;128(4):660–6. DOI: 10.1002/jso.27300
12. Schrager J., Patzer R.E., Mink P.J. et al. Survival outcomes of pediatric osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma: a comparison of surgery type within the SEER database, 1988–2007. Registry Manag 2011;38(3):153–61.
13. Hindiskere S., Staals E., Donati D.M., Manfrini M. What is the survival of the telescope allograft technique to augment a short proximal femur segment in children after resection and distal femur endoprosthesis reconstruction for a bone sarcoma? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021;479(8):1780–90. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001686
14. Nottrott M., Streitbürger A., Gosheger G. et al. Intra-articular soft-tissue sarcoma of the knee: Is extra-articular resection and tumor endoprosthetic reconstruction the solution? A retrospective report on eight cases. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2019;10(1):7764. DOI: 10.4081/or.2019.7764
15. Potter J.W., Jones K.B., Barrott J.J. Sarcoma-The standard-bearer in cancer discovery. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018;126:1–5.
16. Ippolito J.A., Campbell M.L., Siracuse B.L, Benevenia J.J. Reconstruction with custom unicondylar hemiarthroplasty following tumor resection: a case series and review of the literature. Knee Surg 2020;33(8):818–24. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688556
17. Solooki S., Mostafavizadeh Ardestani S.M., Mahdaviazad H., Kardeh B. Function and quality of life among primary osteosarcoma survivors in Iran: amputation versus limb salvage. Musculoskelet Surg 2018;102(2):147–51. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-017-0511-y
Review
For citations:
Petrochenko N.S., Sokolovsky A.V., Sokolovsky V.A., Gribkova E.I., Spirina O.G., Fedorova A.V., Valiev A.K. Role of radical surgical treatment in patients with soft tissue sarcomas invading bone. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin. 2024;16(4):80-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2219-4614-2024-16-4-80-88