Preview

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin

Advanced search

Artificial intelligence in personalized selection of surgical treatment tactics for bone metastases

https://doi.org/10.17650/2219-4614-2024-16-3-11-18

Abstract

Introduction. Selection of surgical treatment tactics for patients with bone metastases is one of the important problems of modern oncology. In the majority of patients with metastatic bone lesions, surgical interventions are aimed at palliative treatment; however, in some cases of solitary metastases, radical resections with a reconstructive component can be performed. Lifespan prognosis associated with histological structure of malignant tumor is the main and crucial factor in determination of suitable type of surgical treatment.

Aim. To create software for selection of surgical tactics treatment in patients with bone metastases.

Materials and methods. Treatments of 715 patients who underwent surgical interventions for bone metastases of various locations were analyzed. In total, 780 surgeries were performed. Surgical interventions due to complex progression of bone metastases in the vertebral bones were performed in 48.5 % of cases, long bones in 247 (35 %) cases, pelvic bones in 81 (11 %) cases, thoracic bones in 40 (5.5 %) cases.

Results. Complete elimination or significant reduction of pain syndrome after surgical treatment of bone metastases were observed in 629 (88 %) patients. Improved quality of life per the Karnofsky and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scales after surgery was observed in 633 (88.5 %) patients. Postoperative complications developed in 49 (7 %) patients, mostly of infectious type (21 (3 %) cases). Errors in selection of surgical treatment tactics were identified in 49 (7 %) cases. Overall 1-year survival was 52 %. Based on the results of analysis of international literature data and our own experience, treatment algorithm for this patient category was modernized, and 14-point lifespan prognosis scale was developed. Their use allowed to develop the BoneMetaLife software for determination of surgical treatment tactics for bone metastases.

Conclusion. Adequate surgical tactics for treatment of bone metastases of various parts of the skeleton and favorable oncological prognosis improves patients’ quality of life and increases survival in patients with solitary metastases. Development of new treatment tactics based on patient lifespan prognosis and algorithms of surgical treatment will allow to decrease the probability of errors in selection of onco-orthopedic help and increase treatment effectiveness.

About the Authors

A. V. Bukharov
P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284



A. A. Kurilchik
A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

10 Marshala Zhukova St., Obninsk 249031

63 14th Line, Rostov-on-Don 344037



A. A. Barashev
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

63 14th Line, Rostov-on-Don 344037



V. A. Derzhavin
P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284



A. V. Yadrina
P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284



D. A. Erin
P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Dmitry Alekseevich Еrin

3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284



D. O. Elkhov
P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284



M. D. Aliev
National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284



A. D. Kaprin
National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284



References

1. Bukharov A.V., Aliyev M.D., Derzhavin V.A., Yadrina A.V. Strategy of personalized surgical treatment of cancer patients with bone metastases. Onkologiya. Zhurnal im. P.A. Gertcena = Oncology. P.A. Herzen Journal 2020;9(3):61–5. (In Russ.).

2. Bauer H.C. Controversies in the surgical management of skeletal metastases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87(5):608–17. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.16021

3. Guerrieri A.N., Montesi M., Sprio S. et al. Innovative options for bone metastasis treatment: an extensive analysis on biomaterials- based strategies for orthopedic surgeons. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020(6);8:589964. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.589964

4. Janssen S.J., van der Heijden A.S., van Dijke M. et al. 2015 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: prognostication in patients with long bone metastases: does a boosting algorithm improve survival estimates? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473(10):3112–21. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4446-z

5. Li Y., Hu C. Prevalence and prognosis of synchronous distant metastatic tonsil squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Med Sci 2021;18(2):528–33. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.50966

6. Aliyev M.D. Oncoortopedia yesterday, today, tomorrow. Vestnik onkologicheskogo obshchestva = Bulletin of the Cancer Society 2013;5(598):3–4. (In Russ.).

7. Bollen L., van der Linden Y.M., Pondaag W. et al. Prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with symptomatic spinal bone metastases: a retrospective cohort study of 1,043 patients. Neuro Oncol 2014;16(7):991–8. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not318

8. Owari T., Miyake M., Nakai Y. et al. External validation of a genitourinary cancer-specific prognostic scoring system to predict survival for patients with bone metastasis. J Bone Oncol 2021;36:100280. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100344

9. Katagiri H., Okada R., Takagi T. et al. New prognostic factors and scoring system for patients with skeletal metastasis. Cancer Med 2014;3(5):1359–67. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.292

10. Wei L.Y., Kok S.H., Lee Y.C. et al. Prognosis of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws in metastatic prostate cancer patients. Oral Dis 2020;28(1):182–92. DOI: 10.1111/odi.13737

11. Zhang L., Hou G., Gao M. et al. Novel survival nomograms for patients with lung metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99(52):e23465. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023465


Review

For citations:


Bukharov A.V., Kurilchik A.A., Barashev A.A., Derzhavin V.A., Yadrina A.V., Erin D.A., Elkhov D.O., Aliev M.D., Kaprin A.D. Artificial intelligence in personalized selection of surgical treatment tactics for bone metastases. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin. 2024;16(3):11-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2219-4614-2024-16-3-11-18

Views: 1549


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2219-4614 (Print)
ISSN 2782-3687 (Online)