Еndoprosthetic revision with the use of intramedullary endoprosthesis fixation by the Compress system
Abstract
The bone resection with endoprosthetic replacement of large joints is the method of choice for tumors and tumor-like diseases of the bones. In more than 80% of cases of primary and metastatic bone tumors, with modern integrated treatment approach to conservative intervention in the amount of bone resection with endoprosthetic replacement. However, the frequency of endoprosthetic revision for the various complications ranges from 5 to 50% according to different sources. The difficulty of performing the endoprosthetic revision is often due to a lack of unmodified bone tissue, soft tissue, infection lodge of the endoprosthesis.
About the Authors
I. R. Aglullin
Tatarstan Regional Clinical Cancer Center;
Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kazan
I. R. Safin
Tatarstan Regional Clinical Cancer Center;
Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kazan
D. V. Rukavishnikov
Tatarstan Regional Clinical Cancer Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kazan
A. Yu. Rodionova
Tatarstan Regional Clinical Cancer Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kazan
References
1. Алиев М.Д., Соколовский В.А., Дмитриева Н.В. и соавт. Осложнения при эндопротезировании больных с опухолями костей. Вестник РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН. 2003, № 2 (доп. 1), с. 35-39.
2. Трапезников Н.Н., Алиев М.Д., Соколовский В.А. и соавт. Использование новых материалов и технологий при эндопротезировании больных с опухолями костей. В кн.: Первый интернациональный симпозиум пластической и реконструктивной хирургии в онкологии. М., 1997, с. 84.
3. Чиссов В.И., Алиев М.Д., Семиглазов В.Ф. и соавт. Сберегательные и органосохраняющие операции при злокачественных опухолях костей и мягких тканей. Пособие для врачей. СПб., 2004.
4. Fechner R.E., Mills S.E. Tumors of The Bones and Joints. Bethesda, Maryland. 1993, p. 170-177.
5. Hardes J., Roeller Y., Gosheger G. et al. Modular endoprosthetic replacement with megaprosthesis – an analysis of complication. Abstracts. 12th ISOLS, Brazil. 2003, p. 138.
6. Malawer M.M., Chou L.B. Prosthetic survival and clinical results with use of large – segment replacements in the treatment of high – grade bone sarcomas. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1995, v. 77A, p. 1178-1182.
7. Muschler G.F., Levine M.J., Ihara K., Otis J.C., Lane J.M., BursteinA.H., Healey J.H. Acustom distal femoral prosthesis for reconstruction of large defects following wide excision for sarcoma: results and prognostic factors. Orthopedics. 1995, v. 18 (6), p. 527-538.
8. Myers G.J., AbuduA.T., Carter S.R. et al. The long-term results of endoprosthetic replacements of the proximal tibia for bone tumors. J. Bone Joint Surg. 2007, v. 89 (12), р. 1632-1627.
Review
For citations:
Aglullin I.R., Safin I.R., Rukavishnikov D.V., Rodionova A.Yu. Еndoprosthetic revision with the use of intramedullary endoprosthesis fixation by the Compress system. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin. 2015;(3):8-11. (In Russ.)
Views:
82
Email this article 
