Efficiency of contrast enchased ultrasound guided biopsy in soft tissue sarcoma diagnosis
Abstract
Objective. To determine the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guided core-needle biopsy (CNB) of soft tissue tumors.
Materials and methods. CEUS-guided biopsy of soft tissue tumors was performed in 59 cases (main group). In control group (59 patients) biopsy was performed under ultrasound navigation in B-mode.
Results. In the main group biopsy sample was informative in 100% of cases versus 91% in the control group. Sensitivity and negative-predictive value in the main group were 100% (versus 95% and 87% in control group respectively). Finally, diagnosis during the preoperative examination was correct in 90% cases in the main group (versus 68% in control group). This study confirms the diagnostic value of CEUS-guided biopsy method.
About the Authors
G. V. Zinovev
N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
G. I. Gafton
N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
E. A. Busko
N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
A. V. Mishchenko
N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
I. V. Grinenko
N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
I. G. Gafton
N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
References
1. Алиев М.Д., Мень Т.Х. Заболеваемость саркомами мягких тканей в России. Саркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2013, № 3, с. 3-9.
2. Мацко Д.Е. Современные представления о морфологической классификации сарком мягких тканей и их практическое значение. Практическая онкология. 2013, т. 14, № 2, с. 77-83.
3. Новиков Н.Е. Контрастно-усиленные ультразвуковые исследования. История развития и современные возможности. Российский электронный журнал лучевой диагностики. 2012, т. 2, № 1, с. 20-28.
4. Семенов И.И., Зайцев А.Н., Крживицкий П.И., Пономарева А.И. Методы диагностики и оценки степени распространения процесса при саркомах мягких тканей. Практическая онкология. 2013, т. 14, № 2, с. 87-96.
5. Соновью. Научная монография. Динамическое контрастное усиление в режиме реального времени. 2013, с. 6-40.
6. Hoeber I., Spillane A.J., Fisher C. et al. Accuracy of biopsy techniques for limb and limb girdle soft tissue tumors. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2001, v. 1, p. 80-87.
7. Mitsuyoshi G., Naito N., Kawai A. et al. Accurate diagnosis of musculoskeletal lesions by core needle biopsy. J. Surg. Oncol. 2006, v. 94, p. 21-27.
8. Quaia E., Calliada F., Bertolotto M. et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-specific US modes and a sulfurhexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent: diagnostic performance and confidence. Radiology. 2004, v. 232 (2), p. 420-430.
9. Shapeero L.G., Vanel D., Verstraete K.L. et al. Fast magnetic resonance imaging with contrast for soft tissue sarcoma viability. Clin. Orthop. Relat. 2002, v. 397, p. 212-227.
10. Torriani M., Etchebehere M., Amstalden E. Sonographically guided core needle biopsy of bone and soft tissuetumors. J. Ultrasound Med. 2002, v. 21, p. 275-281.
11. Wilson S.R., Kim T.K., Jang H.J., Burns P.N. Enhancement patterns of focal liver masses: discordance between contrastenhanced sonography and contrastenhanced CT and MRI. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007, v. 189 (1), p. 7-12.
12. Wu J.S., Goldsmith J.D., Horwich P.J. et al. Bone and soft tissue lesions: what factors affect diagnostic yield of image-guided core needle biopsy? Radiology. 2008, v. 248, p. 962-970.
Review
For citations:
Zinovev G.V., Gafton G.I., Busko E.A., Mishchenko A.V., Grinenko I.V., Gafton I.G. Efficiency of contrast enchased ultrasound guided biopsy in soft tissue sarcoma diagnosis. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin. 2017;(2):32-38. (In Russ.)
Views:
131
Email this article 
