Experience of using personalized titanium vertebral corpectomy prosthesis for replacement of postresection defects in children with aggressive benign spinal tumors

Introduction. Aggressive benign spinal tumors in children frequently require extensive surgical resection necessitating complex reconstructive interventions. Currently, vertebrologists have at their disposal a large number of prostheses for replacement of the anterior supporting column. Both static implants and extendable spacer are used. However, these implants have limitations which can affect long-term results especially in children when growth should be taken into account and long-term stability of the prosthesis should be assured. Design of personalized titanium prostheses adapted to anatomical features of the vertebrae allows to solve these problems.

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of using personalized titanium vertebral corpectomy prostheses for reconstruction of postresection defects in children with aggressive benign spinal tumors (stage III per the Enneking classification).

Materials and methods. The study included 5 patients of pediatric age who underwent two-stage surgical intervention including dorsal stabilization, tumor resection and installation of a personalized titanium vertebral corpectomy prosthesis manufactured using direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) 3D printing.

Results. No significant complications were observed in the postoperative period. In the first 3 months, neurological status was completely restored in all patients. Computed tomography showed stable implant integration; minimal signs of prosthesis subsidence (1 mm without signs of resorption around screw implants) were observed only in 1 case.

Conclusion. The use of personalized titanium vertebral corpectomy prostheses improves the results of surgical treatment of spinal tumors in children. The proposed innovative technique of postresection defect replacement with personalized implants manufactured by 3D printing increases spinal fixation stability after extensive tumor resection and decreases the risk of complications associated with implant instability. The use of additive methods of prosthesis manufacturing allows to solve complex reconstruction problems in spinal surgical interventions in children.

1. Hell A.K., Kühnle I., Lorenz H.M. et al. Spinal deformities after childhood tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12(12):3555. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123555

2. Jones M., Alshameeri Z., Uhiara O. et al. En bloc resection of tumors of the lumbar spine: a systematic review of outcomes and complications. Int J Spine Surg 2021;15(6):1223–33. DOI: 10.14444/8155

3. Boriani S., Bandiera S., Donthineni R. et al. Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine. Eur Spine J 2010;19(2):231–41. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1137-z

4. Hu J., Song G., Chen H. et al. Surgical outcomes and risk factors for surgical complications after en bloc resection following reconstruction with 3D-printed artificial vertebral body for thoracolumbar tumors. World J Surg Oncol 202314;21(1):385. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03271-8

5. Zhang Y., Li H., Wang W. et al. A novel technology for 3D-printing artificial vertebral bodies for treating lumbar spine adrenal pheochromocytoma metastases: a case report and review of the literature. Orthop Surg 2023;15(12):3335–41. DOI: 10.1111/os.13899

6. Wei F., Li Z., Liu Z. et al. Upper cervical spine reconstruction using customized 3D-printed vertebral body in 9 patients with primary tumors involving C2. Ann Transl Med 2020;8(6):332. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.32

7. Hanawa T. Titanium-tissue interface reaction and its control with surface treatment. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019;7:170. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00170

8. Sarraf M., Rezvani Ghomi E., Alipour S. et al. A state-of-the-art review of the fabrication and characteristics of titanium and its alloys for biomedical applications. Biodes Manuf 2022;5(2):371–95. DOI: 10.1007/s42242-021-00170-3

9. McBeth C., Lauer J., Ottersbach M. et al. 3D bioprinting of GelMA scaffolds triggers mineral deposition by primary human osteoblasts. Biofabrication 2017;9(1):015009. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa53bd

10. Fujibayashi S., Takemoto M., Neo M. et al. A novel synthetic material for spinal fusion: a prospective clinical trial of porous bioactive titanium metal for lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2011;20(9):1486–95. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1728-3

11. Tack P., Victor J., Gemmel P., Annemans L. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online 2016;15(1):115. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4

12. Tang X., Yang Y., Zang J. et al. Preliminary results of a 3D-printed modular vertebral prosthesis for anterior column reconstruction after multilevel thoracolumbar total en bloc spondylectomy. Orthop Surg 2021;13(3):949–57. DOI: 10.1111/os.12975

13. Girolami M., Boriani S., Bandiera S. et al. Biomimetic 3D-printed custom-made prosthesis for anterior column reconstruction in the thoracolumbar spine: a tailored option following en bloc resection for spinal tumors: preliminary results on a case-series of 13 patients. Eur Spine J 2018;27(12):3073–83. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5708-8

14. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983;8(8):817–31. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198311000-00003

15. Cao Y., Yang N., Wang S. et al. The application of 3D-printed auto-stable artificial vertebral body in en bloc resection and reconstruction of thoracolumbar metastases. J Orthop Surg Res 2023;18(1):638. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04135-3

16. Vasudeva V.S., Chi J.H., Groff M.W. Surgical treatment of aggressive vertebral hemangiomas. Neurosurg Focus 2016;41(2):E7. DOI: 10.3171/2016.5.FOCUS16169