Long-term patient rehabilitation and quality of life after oncological endoprosthesis of long bones and joints

Background. Currently, endoprosthesis of large bones and joints is the standard of treatment for patients with tumors in the bones and joints of the upper and lower limbs and pelvis. However, the problem of integrated medical rehabilitation of these patients remains unsolved. In the postoperative period, patients frequently experience such functional abnormalities as limited mobility in the operated joint, pain, deceased locomotor activity in the joints due to prolonged bedrest leading to muscle hypotrophy. These abnormalities interfere with return to full social life affecting patients’ quality of life and making rehabilitation very important.  

Aim. To evaluate the effect of rehabilitation on patients’ quality of life and social adaptation after oncological endoprosthesis.  

Materials and methods. The study included 57 patients: 27 (47 %) males and 30 (53 %) females. Mean age was 46 years (19–71 years). In 10 patients, tumors were localized in the bones of the upper limb; in 6 patients, in the pelvic bones; in 41 patients, in the bones of the lower limb. Tumor volume varied between 24 and 3,783 cm3 (median 631 cm3 ). Pathological fractures were observed in 13 (24.5 %) patients, their risk – in 13 (24.5 %) patients. Patient activization was started at day 1–14 after surgery, passive working out of the operated limb on day 2–14. For quality of life evaluation, The Short Form-36 (SF-36) was used allowing to determine patients’ health. Functional results were analyzed using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score (MSTS), rehabilitation potential using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia covering both physical and psychological components. Social status was evaluated based on patient’s occupation and social adaptation. 

Results. Performance of active rehabilitation activities after onco-orthopedic intervention allows 72 % of patients to achieve good and excellent functional results per the MSTS scale (60–97 %) under condition of protective regimen observation, as well as positively affects physical and psychological parts of quality of life. Use of Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia allows to correct psychological and/or physical parts of kinesiophobia in a timely fashion. Adequately performed rehabilitation allows 46 % of patients to remain socially active, continue working.  

Conclusion. Scale of surgical intervention, presence of pathological fracture, as well as postoperative complications, affect both functional results and quality of life of patients which in this period in most observations is higher than prior to onco-orthopedic treatment. Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia allows to evaluate patient motivation towards postoperative recovery and provide psychological help in a timely manner which decreases rehabilitation time. 

1. Balabukha O.S. Kachestvo zhizni kak osnova programm reabilitatsii onkologicheskikh bol'nykh. Mezhdunarodnyi meditsinskii zhurnal 2010;4:11-13. Balabukha O.S. Quality of life as the basis of rehabilitation programs for cancer patients. Mezhdunarodnyj medicinskij zhurnal = International Medical Journal 2010;4:11-13. (In Russ.).

2. Grushina T.I., Teplyakov V.V. Fizioterapiya pri rannei reabilitatsii bol'nykh s kostnymi sarkomami posle endoprotezirovaniya krupnykh kostei i sustavov. Fizioterapiya, bal'neologiya i reabilitatsiya 2018;17(4):192-8. https://doi.org/10.18821/1681-3456-2018-17-4-192-198 Grushina T.I., Teplyakov V.V. Physiotherapy in early rehabilitation of patients with bone sarcomas after endoprosthetics of large bones and joints. Fizioterapiya, bal'neologiya i reabilitaciya = Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation 2018;17(4):192-8. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18821/1681-3456-2018-17-4-192-198

3. Cherkasova E.A., Krom I.L., Novichkova I.Yu. Mediko-sotsiologicheskoe obosnovanie reabilitatsii onkologicheskikh bol'nykh. Sotsiologicheskie nauki 2013;2:10-15. Cherkasova E.A., Krom I.L., Novichkova I.Yu. Medical and sociological justification of rehabilitation of cancer patients. Sociologicheskie nauki = Social Sciences 2013;2:10-15. (In Russ.).

4. Kotel'nikova A.V., Kukshina A.A. Aprobatsiya metodiki izmereniya kineziofobii u bol'nykh s narusheniem dvigatel'nykh funktsii. Eksperimental'naya psikhologiya 2018;11(2):50-62. Kotelnikova A.V., Kukshina A.A. Approbation of the method of measuring kinesiophobia in patients with impaired motor functions. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya = Experimental Psychology 2018;11(2):50-62. (In Russ.).

5. Nenarokomov A.Yu., Speranskii D.L., Arevshatov E.V., Mudryi A.Yu. Sovremennaya kontseptsiya issledovaniya kachestva zhizni v onkologii. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya 2012;2-2:421-5. Nenarokomov A.Yu., Speransky D.L., Arevshatov E.V., Mudry A.Yu. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya = Modern concept of quality of life research in oncology. Fundamental Research 2012;2-2:421-5. (In Russ.).

6. Khudoshin N.A., Abaeva O.P., Romanov S.V. Dinamika kachestva zhizni patsientov posle total'nogo endoprotezirovaniya tazobedrennogo sustava. Saratovskii nauchno-meditsinskii zhurnal 2021;17(4):760-4. Khudoshin N.A., Abaeva O.P., Romanov S.V. Dynamics of quality of life of patients after total hip replacement. Saratovskij nauchno-medicinskij zhurnal = Saratov Journal of Medical Science 2021;17(4):760-4. (In Russ.).

7. Amirdzhanova V.N., Goryachev D.V., Korshunov N.I. i dr. Populyatsionnye pokazateli kachestva zhizni po oprosniku SF-36 (rezul'taty mnogotsentrovogo issledovaniya kachestva zhizni «MIRAZh»). Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya 2008;1:36-48. Amirdzhanova V.N., Goryachev D.V., Korshunov N.I. et al. Population indicators of quality of life according to the SF-36 questionnaire (results of the multicenter study of quality of life “Mirage”). Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya = Scientific and Practical Rheumatology 2008;1:36-48. (In Russ.).

8. Stepanova A.M. Prakticheskie rekomendatsii po reabilitatsii onkoortopedicheskikh bol'nykh: obzor literatury. Fizicheskaya i reabilitatsionnaya meditsina, meditsinskaya reabilitatsiya 2019;3:73-8. https://doi.org/10.36425/2658-6843-2019-3-73-78 Stepanova A.M. Practical recommendations for the rehabilitation of oncoortopedic patients: literature review. Fizicheskaya i reabilitacionnaya medicina, medicinskaya reabilitaciya = Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation 2019;3:73-8. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36425/2658-6843-2019-3-73-78

9. Ware J.E., Snow K.K., Kosinski M., Gandek V. SF-36 Health Survey. Manuel and Interpretation Guide, Lincoln, RI. Quality Metric Incorporated, 2000. 10. Enneking W.F., Dunham W., Gebhardt M.C. et al. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;286:241-6.

10. Kotel'nikova A.V., Kukshina A.A., Pogonchenkova I.V. i dr. Prakticheskoe primenenie metodiki «Shkala Tampa» v protsesse meditsinskoi reabilitatsii bol'nykh s narusheniem dvigatel'nykh funktsii: Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. M., 2018. 21 s. Dostupno po: https://niioz.ru/upload/iblock/df2/df29ff5b3f68d1de5ee7baa37fedbc77.pdf. Kotelnikova A.V., Kukshina A.A., Pogonchenkova I.V. et al. Practical application of the “Tampa Scale” technique in the process of medical rehabilitation of patients with impaired motor functions: Methodological recommendations. Moscow, 2018. 21 p. (In Russ.). Available at: https://niioz.ru/upload/iblock/df2/df29ff5b3f68d1de5ee7baa37fedbc77.p